Echo JS 0.11.0

<~>

davidspiess 2820 days ago. link 3 points
Hasn't this already been solved by using a bundler which supports tree shaking? Performance improvements sound great but i don't think they are noticeable in our real world apps. What do you do if you suddenly realize you need one of the not included ramda functions? Write them yourself? I guess not, so why bother using it?
self_refactor 2820 days ago. link 1 point
You are right that the library is useless if you need to use Rambda's method, that it is not included. But the library is created for size optimization, not speed. Even tree-shaking Ramda can't help you in all cases, as the size of Ramda is not small.
spbcypher 2820 days ago. link 1 point
Moreover, it's possible to make custom (partial) ramda build. Have no serious reason to deal with it.
self_refactor 2820 days ago. link 1 point
My problem is that even a custom build is not small in size. If you need to optimize frontend performance, this size issue is real.