Echo JS 0.11.0

<~>
davidspiess 2789 days ago. link 3 points ▲ ▼
Hasn't this already been solved by using a bundler which supports tree shaking? Performance improvements sound great but i don't think they are noticeable in our real world apps. What do you do if you suddenly realize you need one of the not included ramda functions? Write them yourself? I guess not, so why bother using it?

Replies

self_refactor 2789 days ago. link 1 point ▲ ▼
You are right that the library is useless if you need to use Rambda's method, that it is not included. But the library is created for size optimization, not speed. Even tree-shaking Ramda can't help you in all cases, as the size of Ramda is not small.