Echo JS 0.11.0

Everything faster than WebPack, but not supported same features ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ that's why faster

This does not really sound like a serious project. About half of the readme is cheap marketing jabber.

Thanks for your response. You can check examples if you wish.
It really does what it says.

I'm not saying it does not live up to its claims. But it is hard to find out with so much introduction text :)

Is there a dev-server included in fuse-box?

I understand that. It could be more concise. The thing is I  don't have a website yet. But I have put it somewhere. 

dev-server is not there yet. But it will be supported in the very near future

I try fuse-box in a ionic2 project and it compiles from 
ionic-cli in 17 sec in fuse-box ( without the scss from ionic) in 203 MS thats a word i will have eyes on it

I tried switching to fuse-box from browserify. It was a bit faster than straight browserify, but not faster than browserify with persistify. My bundles were taking between 350-650 ms with 21 files adding up to 230k - not a large project by any means.

Ultimately I had to switch back to browserify because I do two different builds, one for dev with sourcemaps, and one for production without sourcemaps. The .fusebox cache was getting screwed up when I switched builds, causing runtime failures because modules were missing. I could remove the cache every time I start a watch or a build, but it takes 3.5 seconds to build from an empty cache, which is crazy slow.

Sorry to hear that, we work hard every day to make FuseBox  better

Can someone explain why its "10× faster".

There is a benchmark proving that. With cache enabled, it's actually going way beyond that. 

https://github.com/fuse-box/angular2-example

Try using webpack on this project. And compare to fuse-box. You will get a convincing result.

The question was not about a prove but explaining how it was  done, why is webpack slow, what does this project does right.

1) Fusebox is not just a bundler it's a loader with a pretty comprehensive API, which WebPack does not offer.

2) FuseBox supports typescript out of the box. It compiles and bundles it in a matter of milliseconds

3) Unlike WebPack, FuseBox does not modify and regenerate the source code. That's a performance boost.

There is so much more,

It does so much more. You won't believe it.

"watch" or "hot module reolad" is planned?

Yes! I am planning to add a task runner, and "hot module reload" is definitely on my list.