Is this a satire?
For all its ire & acid, "The Sad State of Web Development" at least tried to make a cogent argument. All I'm seeing here is a person who got overwhelmed by jargon and kneejerked to vomit out another diatribe on medium.com.
The author would do better to focus on a series exploring their tour through modern JavaScript and its ecosystem, stopping to explain similarities and differences with other features, languages, or frameworks. That would feel a little bit more like learning than a bunch of sarcastic quips. If the author still felt compelled to follow-up with such remarks, then at least they'd have been a bit more vindicated.
I really like the vue implementation a guy posted in the comments:
https://jsfiddle.net/chrisvfritz/aomd3y9n/
simple, beautiful and without the bloat mentioned in the article.
LOL at the reference to npm being "oh, like Bower" which is funny because you need node+npm to install Bower... something I always found incredibly amusing. and the biggest knock against Bower in the first place.
The rest of the rant is a little funny, but seriously... for the use case, jQuery would probably be fine... I'd probably use babel with the polyfills, and run through that.