Echo JS 0.11.0

<~>
tracker1 850 days ago. link parent 2 points
It wasn't particularly click-baity, the all caps (and when people add emojis) is unwelcome by most.

The main point was that lists that don't have an associated method of *HOW* that list was generated, or why the said items are on that list etc, or mention of what was/wasn't included is significant.

When mentioning speed/performance/fast, it often comes down to metrics.  I've personally enjoyed your posts... I didn't downvote myself, I'm only speaking to why someone might have downvoted... And to me it largely comes down to "Top N for X" type lists that don't have any methodology are often deleted outright... framework/tool comparisons in particular are often low quality/listicles... I left this in as there's value to it.  I can't control how others vote.

Replies

DustinBrett 848 days ago. link 2 points
Ok you've convinced me to post here again. I see your comments a lot, like the one reigning in openreplay. I wish you and the site luck. Hopefully it gets bigger one day and the commenting increases. I like feedback.