Echo JS 0.11.0

WARNING: GPLv3, can be argued that any application using this library must also be GPLv3, if you're serving this library on the internet, your entire application must provide source on request.

I tend to use the following library (MIT License): https://www.npmjs.com/package/mui-icons

Which wraps svg icons in a consistent way, compatible with the mui frameworks.  Provides access to several icon libraries including an expanded set of material icons (cmdi).

Nice to see this done by hand.  I do generally just defer to date-fns when I need to manipulate date-time logic though. Just depends on what you're doing.

I try to keep most app slices under 200kb for JS assets. With a shared library slices between 200k-500k.

For the most part I remove articles/projects tethered to commercial products.  While it relies on a commercial piece of hardware, it's otherwise on topic and I find it interesting.

Given that I'm not aware of other products that support JS and Bluetooth, mostly curious what everyone else thinks.

Should the domain be blocked, or should I keep this site's content flowing?

Looks interresting, starred and will probably look into this later.

Or..

let array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];

array.sort((a, b) => Math.round(Math.random()) || -1)

console.log(array)

With data attributes, any current browser supports the dataset property on the dom object... so e.target.dataset.id instead of e.target.getAttribute('data-id')

Other than that, the useCallback method is interresting at least.

I tend to prefer data attributes (dataset) because then it renders and is able to be utilized by ui/integration test frameworks.

This isn't JS related.

Changed link to point to github source, which links to game site.

Cool, hadn't dug into this, but seems interresting.  Don't know that I'd use it outside of an appImage, unsure if there are packaging options, or FS limitations that are similar in Mac/Windows.

Are any of the dynamic/js based swf modules reasonable for this?  I know it's not quite the same.

I'm not seeing any way to actually wire and/or process payments.  Guessing this is a literal paywall behind the commercial version.