Echo JS 0.11.0

Considered a bug in the language? Hmmm :)

Seems you have to clone the repo and run locally

I don't understand why you shouldn't support sass out of the box. Other than maybe the heavy extra dependencies, but if that's a reason, there should be an easy opt-in at least.
Also, relative import paths as the convention..
Makes refactoring folder structures really hard, and you can't avoid that when an app grows. It's so easy with a webpack alias, I'd be happy to know why to not build it into such a project by default. It's not that relative aths would stop working..

The switch-case example can easily bei Silvester with a fat-arrow iifo

Btw, on my mobile the up and down vote buttons are small enough and close enough that i managed to downvote stuff accidentally when actually i wanted to vote up - Karma lost, downvote on a rather good article and it's even persisted - argh! :)

I find this very interesting. It's easy to forget that the world isn't so united after all, not even in the times of a world wide web. Thanks for sharing!

Wow the Firefox used there is a Hellfox

Yep, always returns a new function, cause the component that uses the prop to rerender.
This approach just moves a problem around, changing its semantics, without actually solving the problem.

If you use babel anyway, the best way to go, IMO, is https://www.npmjs.com/package/autobind-decorator

If you want more, you can use https://www.npmjs.com/package/javascript-decorators

What is it with the French here now...this might as well be consudered Spam, as most of us don't understand it,even if it's about js. What if the Chinese Community starts posting here..?

The downvotes are unclear to me. It's not a bad article, regardless of Module type preference..