I agree from a personal stand point that JavaScript fatigue can be self induced. As an example, in my spare time I like to pick up new trends and play with new frameworks or libraries as much as I can. I'm lucky in that professionally I have a high degree of autonomy and I can control the "speed of change" at which new things get adopted and how change affects me.
However, I hear a lot of people exposing very articulate arguments and compelling stories about JavaScript fatigue. And I can understand where they are coming from. But because I am privileged enough as to not be burned out by how quickly "things" change I would not go as far as to say that people who feel that fatigue should blame themselves.
Without putting too much effort I can think of a few situations leading to people feeling this way in which they have no control.
My point was that the article did not address this in any way.
While it's nice that someone took the time to write a response and while it does address everything React related in the original article I'm not sure is making a true argument addressing the underlying critique of the original article- or other similar articles.
What I understood to be the real critique of the original article: JavaScript fatigue, see [this old article from 2015] (https://medium.com/@ericclemmons/javascript-fatigue-48d4011b6fc4.)