Echo JS 0.11.0

> vim package.json

Can't I just use the editor of my choice? What if I'm on Windows?

What I actually mean is that if you want to write a tutorial like that, you can (and preferably should) leave thid kind of details to the reader. You can just say: "Create the package.json file and put in the following content: ..."

You know what, I could give it a try. I still am unconvinced by npm's decision to flatten the dependency tree, so I guess anothr approach is welcome.

Do you plan to support yarn.lock files as well?

It's just you.

Also, this one doesn't bash Webpack.

Looks interesting, but I don't know if it belongs to EchoJS.

Again, you really need to make npm packages out of these modules. It'd be great if you get along with the Node ecosystem.

I still think === is the way to go in most of the cases. Object.is has an advantage when dealing with some numeric edge cases, but that's pretty much all. For the est, it's more verbose and less readable.

Sheesh, we really don't need to become as toxic as Reddit.

Can we please have this topic deleted? EchoJS isn't the place for developer feuds.

Why would someone in their right mind post something like that here?!

The first one can be done in ES5.

Remember, kids: copy from Stack Overflow responsibly.

http://i.imgur.com/SZPjHwz.jpg