I saw your project a while ago and it was really interesting.
What kind of contribution are you looking for exactly? What aspects of the project need help?
Indeed, I don't think CoffeeScript is still relevant.
But we have to admit that it spun a lot of innoation in the JavaScript community in the past, leading to the whole ES6 new syntax. A lot ot remarkable projects (Atom comes to mind) are built using CoffeeScript.
But now that ES6 *is* here... well... It looks like it's yet-another-language-that-compiles-to-JavaScript. With nothing much to add, I'm afraid.
Well, it's the usual drill: when not holding primitive values, it's the reference to the object to be immutable, not the object itself.
You're better off with Object.freeze (which does not deep-freeze it anyway).
> Ok, as I said for another commenter, it seems that you missed the point.
Or maybe you haven't been clear enough?
> Eric and Feross were _examples_.
In fact, I said "for example Eric Elliott..." Can't I use your own examples?
> my post aim to _ask_ what you people think about it, if we can do something about if, if you think it's ok like this, if you feel the same way I do.
And that's exactly what I posted.
Or maybe you don't think I did because that wasn't the answer you were expecting?
TL;DR: this is the library: function sarcasm() { return 'This is great project' } export default sarcasm export { sarcasm }