Echo JS 0.11.0

<~>

MaxArt comments

MaxArt 1645 days ago. link 0 point
Tailwind is a workaround, but it's not the answer.

The answer is a solid design system.
MaxArt 1645 days ago. link 1 point
Personally, I have no problem with CSS. I love CSS.

So, usually it's explaining the others that throwing declarations until they see something stick isn't the right way to do CSS...
MaxArt 1645 days ago. link 1 point
It's definitely not something I was expecting to find on Echo JS and it's a facepalm-inducing dad joke.

But have my upvote.
MaxArt 1657 days ago. link 1 point
I think I guessed it right then. It doesn't "fix" anything, as everything works fine. It appeals your own sense of aesthetics.
For this kind of things, I suggest creating a use style sheet to be installed with Stylus or other similar extensions. GitHub's new UI is... fairly new, so it's subject to change. Updating a Chrome extension can be a hassle.
MaxArt 1660 days ago. link 1 point
Uh, what does it "fix"?
It looks like it just applies some style.
MaxArt 1676 days ago. link 1 point
Who told I haven't taken a closer look? I've even starred the repo *a long time ago*.
I stand by my position. I don't consider a limitation just what's implemented in the polyfill, which is actually quite good - but also the performance impact of the solution, and the outlook of the usefulness of it. Polyfilled custom properties can't be animated, for once; and generally a bit chunk of their actual convenience comes with Web Components and Shadow DOM (which can be shimmed with *severe* limitations in IE), and in the future with all the Houdini APIs.

To quote what Echo JS' mod tracker1 said 5 months ago: "Personally, I don't support any version of IE at this point.  It's EOL, replaced and a security risk.  Not to mention the shims/shivs/transforms needed for ES2017+ are massive.  It's a  target that's not worth taking for the most part."
In short: if I *have* to support IE, CSS Custom Properties are the least of my concerns. That doesn't change the fact that *any* polyfill for IE is a remarkable effort that deserves respect.

Also, my original comment *was* about the form of the post. It seems you took it quite personally and I don't know why.
MaxArt 1679 days ago. link 1 point
I have no interest in doing so. IE has long lost my attention.
This doesn't change the fact that the polyfill *is* quite limited, period. There are factual limitations that prevent to reach 100% compatibility.

Please post updates to your library only when you have signficant changes.
And let viewers decide if a demo is "impressive" or not.
[more]